Livedocs
Case Studies
Honduras 2025 Election Analysis
This notebook provides a comprehensive analysis of the Honduras 2025 Presidential Election, including preliminary results, historical trends, and candidate profiles. It identifies key voter concerns, assesses critical risk factors, and explores various outcome scenarios with their business implications. The notebook concludes with a prediction for the most likely winner and strategic recommendations for business leaders, emphasizing the potential for volatility during the transition period.
✓ Data loaded successfully Preliminary Results (34% counted): shape: (4, 5) ┌───────────────────┬────────────────┬────────┬────────────┬───────────────────────┐ │ Candidate ┆ Party ┆ Votes ┆ Percentage ┆ Political_Orientation │ │ --- ┆ --- ┆ --- ┆ --- ┆ --- │ │ str ┆ str ┆ i64 ┆ f64 ┆ str │ ╞═══════════════════╪════════════════╪════════╪════════════╪═══════════════════════╡ │ Nasry Asfura ┆ National Party ┆ 530073 ┆ 40.63 ┆ Conservative │ │ Salvador Nasralla ┆ Liberal Party ┆ 506316 ┆ 38.78 ┆ Centrist │ │ Rixi Moncada ┆ LIBRE ┆ 255972 ┆ 19.59 ┆ Progressive │ │ Others ┆ Other ┆ 12000 ┆ 1.0 ┆ Various │ └───────────────────┴────────────────┴────────┴────────────┴───────────────────────┘ Total votes counted: 1,304,361
preliminary_res...
Output Image image/png - 36c698dd-bb5e-4333-9624-6cc888f962c4
✓ Historical trends visualization created Key Insights: - National Party rebounded from 33.87% (2021) to 40.63% (2025 preliminary) - LIBRE dropped dramatically from 53.61% (2021) to 19.59% (2025 preliminary) - Liberal Party surged from 13.68% (2021) to 38.78% (2025 preliminary) - 2021 saw highest turnout at 69.09%, up from 57.49% in contested 2017 election
voter_concerns
Output Image image/png - 87bcff4c-e271-41ff-825b-2e1d341878ab
✓ Candidate comparison visualization created

Main Candidates Profile

1. Nasry "Tito" Asfura (National Party) - LEADING

  • Current Position: 40.63% (530,073 votes)
  • Age: 67
  • Background: Former Mayor of Tegucigalpa (2014-2022), Construction businessman
  • Key Policies:
    • Free market economics and privatization
    • Infrastructure development and foreign investment
    • Strong military and police presence
    • Pro-US alignment (Trump endorsed)
  • Strengths: Trump endorsement, business credentials, infrastructure track record
  • Weaknesses: Party tainted by ex-President Hernández's drug conviction, corruption allegations

2. Salvador Nasralla (Liberal Party) - SECOND PLACE

  • Current Position: 38.78% (506,316 votes)
  • Age: 72
  • Background: TV sports broadcaster, former Vice President (2022-2024)
  • Key Policies:
    • Anti-corruption crusader
    • Pro-Taiwan, restore diplomatic ties
    • Bukele-style hard-line security approach
    • Labor reforms and open economy
    • Stronger US trade relations
  • Strengths: Anti-corruption message, political outsider image, experienced campaigner (4th run)
  • Weaknesses: Party switching history, age, previous election fraud claims

3. Rixi Moncada (LIBRE) - THIRD PLACE

  • Current Position: 19.59% (255,972 votes)
  • Age: 60
  • Background: Lawyer, former Finance Minister (2022-2024), Defense Minister (2024-2025)
  • Key Policies:
    • "Democratize the economy" - state intervention
    • Protect natural resources from privatization
    • Maintain China diplomatic recognition
    • Anti-corruption (selective enforcement)
    • Continue Castro's progressive agenda
  • Strengths: Government machinery, Castro's 64% approval rating
  • Weaknesses: Dramatic collapse from LIBRE's 2021 landslide, Castro administration corruption scandals, pre-announced she won't accept results

Output Image image/png - 03c79ec5-0bb6-4c5d-809b-15cf05a0c75e
✓ Risk analysis visualization created === SCENARIO ANALYSIS === 1. Asfura Victory (35% probability): - Maintains lead in final count - Trump support materializes as US aid - Business community rallies - Risk: Post-election protests from LIBRE 2. Nasralla Upset (30% probability): - Undecided voters break for anti-corruption message - Urban areas favor him heavily - 34% counted may not reflect final distribution - Risk: Trump withdraws US support 3. Contested Result (25% probability): - Margin <2% triggers disputes - Moncada refuses to concede (already announced) - Multiple fraud allegations - Risk: Repeat of 2017 crisis with violence 4. Recount/Runoff (8% probability): - Electoral Council forced to audit - International pressure for transparency - Delays inauguration (scheduled Jan 25, 2026) 5. Moncada Comeback (2% probability): - Remaining 66% heavily favors LIBRE - Rural areas not yet counted - Government machinery mobilizes - Risk: US aid cutoff, business exodus

Business Implications by Scenario

If Asfura Wins (National Party):

Positive:

  • Stronger US relations and potential aid increase
  • Pro-business, free market policies
  • Infrastructure investment opportunities
  • Regulatory relaxation, privatization opportunities

Negative:

  • Potential social unrest from LIBRE supporters
  • Corruption concerns (party legacy)
  • Environmental regulations may be weakened
  • Labor tensions possible

If Nasralla Wins (Liberal Party):

Positive:

  • Anti-corruption drive could improve business climate
  • Taiwan diplomatic ties = Asian trade opportunities
  • Strong US relations maintained
  • Labor reforms may attract investment

Negative:

  • Bukele-style security crackdown may disrupt business
  • Political instability if Trump withdraws support
  • Uncertainty around economic policy details

If Moncada Wins (LIBRE):

Positive:

  • Policy continuity from Castro administration
  • China trade relations continue
  • Social stability (no regime change)

Negative:

  • Economic interventionism, anti-privatization stance
  • Potential US aid cutoff
  • Business community concern
  • Trump administration hostility
  • Venezuela alignment concerns

PREDICTION: Most Likely Winner

Nasry Asfura (National Party) - 55% Confidence

Reasoning:

  1. Current Lead: Holds 40.63% vs 38.78% for Nasralla with 34% counted - a margin of 23,757 votes

  2. Trump Factor: Direct US presidential endorsement carries weight with:

    • Business community seeking stability
    • Middle-class voters wanting US aid continuation
    • Conservative voters
  3. Historical Pattern: National Party has strong rural organization, and remaining 66% of votes likely include rural areas

  4. Opposition Split: Nasralla and Moncada split the anti-National vote (58.37% combined)

  5. Business Momentum: Private sector backing provides resources for final push

Key Uncertainties:

  • Vote Distribution: Only 34% counted - urban vs rural breakdown unknown
  • Fraud Allegations: All three candidates have pre-emptively claimed fraud
  • Electoral Council Integrity: Institutional weakness creates unpredictability
  • Undecided Voters: Pre-election polls showed 34% undecided - where did they break?
  • Moncada's Refusal: She announced she won't accept preliminary results - guaranteed conflict

Alternative Outcome: Nasralla could still win if:

  • Remaining votes heavily urban (his strength)
  • Anti-corruption message resonated with late deciders
  • Preliminary count favored rural areas that broke for Asfura

Timeline:

  • Electoral Council has 30 days to certify final results
  • Inauguration scheduled: January 25, 2026
  • Expect protests and legal challenges regardless of winner

Output Image image/png - dad0f52a-5932-4b79-8236-3d0b99a470aa
================================================================================ HONDURAS 2025 ELECTION ANALYSIS COMPLETE ================================================================================ ✓ Executive dashboard created ✓ All visualizations generated ✓ Comprehensive analysis ready for stakeholders Report generated: December 01, 2025 at 06:01 AM

Conclusion

The Honduras 2025 presidential election represents a critical inflection point for Central America's second-largest economy. Based on preliminary results (34% counted as of December 1, 2025), the race is effectively between two candidates:

Nasry Asfura (National Party) leads with 40.63%, while Salvador Nasralla (Liberal Party) holds 38.78%. The incumbent LIBRE party's candidate Rixi Moncada trails significantly at 19.59%, representing a dramatic reversal from LIBRE's 2021 landslide victory (53.61%).

Most Likely Outcome: Asfura Victory (55% confidence)

The confluence of Trump's endorsement, business community support, and the National Party's strong rural organization positions Asfura as the frontrunner. However, the narrow 1.85% margin (approximately 24,000 votes) and only 34% of ballots counted means this race remains highly competitive.

Critical Success Factors:

  1. Vote Distribution: The remaining 66% of votes will determine the winner. If heavily urban, Nasralla could prevail; if rural, Asfura strengthens.

  2. Undecided Voter Break: Pre-election polls showed 34% undecided. Their final choice is now embedded in the count.

  3. Electoral Integrity: With all three candidates pre-emptively claiming fraud, the National Electoral Council's credibility is paramount.

  4. International Pressure: OAS, EU, and US monitoring will influence acceptance of results.

Business Impact Matrix:

| Scenario | US Relations | Economic Policy | Investment Climate | Risk Level | |----------|--------------|-----------------|-------------------|------------| | Asfura Wins | Strengthened | Pro-market | Improved | Moderate | | Nasralla Wins | Maintained | Reform-focused | Stable | Low-Moderate | | Moncada Wins | Deteriorated | Interventionist | Uncertain | High | | Contested | Volatile | Paralyzed | Poor | Very High |

Strategic Recommendations for Business Leaders:

Immediate Actions (Next 30 Days):

  • Activate Crisis Management Protocols: Prepare for potential civil unrest
  • Diversify Currency Holdings: Hedge against lempira volatility
  • Secure Supply Chains: Identify alternative routes if protests disrupt logistics
  • Engage All Parties: Maintain relationships regardless of winner

Medium-Term Strategy (3-6 Months):

  • Scenario-Based Planning: Develop contingencies for each outcome
  • Regulatory Monitoring: Track policy changes under new administration
  • Stakeholder Mapping: Identify key decision-makers in likely cabinet
  • Risk Assessment: Evaluate operations in high-risk zones (Tegucigalpa, San Pedro Sula)

Long-Term Considerations (6-12 Months):

  • Policy Alignment: Adapt to new foreign policy orientation (US/China/Taiwan)
  • Investment Timing: Major commitments should await post-inauguration stability
  • ESG Positioning: Environmental regulations may shift dramatically based on winner
  • Labor Relations: Prepare for potential reforms under any administration

Key Uncertainties:

Post-Election Violence: 2017 precedent suggests risk of protests and crackdown
Trump Factor: Unprecedented direct intervention creates bilateral tension
Institutional Collapse: Electoral Council fragmentation threatens legitimacy
Regional Spillover: Venezuela, Nicaragua connections could escalate tensions

Timeline to Watch:

  • December 1-15, 2025: Final vote counting and certification
  • December 15-30, 2025: Legal challenges and potential recounts
  • January 1-24, 2026: Transition period and cabinet formation
  • January 25, 2026: Scheduled inauguration
  • February-March 2026: Policy implementation begins

Final Word:

Honduras' election illustrates the complex interplay of domestic politics, US influence, and economic priorities in Central America. For businesses operating in or considering investment in Honduras, the next 60 days will be critical in shaping the country's trajectory for the next four years.

The safest approach: Prepare for volatility, but remain engaged. History shows that political transitions create both risks and opportunities—those who navigate them skillfully can emerge stronger.


Report compiled: December 1, 2025
Data sources: National Electoral Council of Honduras, Associated Press, BBC, Al Jazeera, AS/COA, WOLA, academic polling organizations
Next update: Upon final result certification (expected mid-December 2025)

Output Image image/png - 4e8bd434-15d1-404d-8c11-15b9105fe441
✓ Historical context visualization created ====================================================================== KEY TAKEAWAY: ====================================================================== 2025 represents a return to competitive, contested elections after 2021's peaceful landslide. The current margin (1.85%) is nearly identical to 2017's (1.53%), which led to a major political crisis. However, 2025 has HIGHER risks due to: • US direct intervention (Trump endorsement) • Three-way split (no clear consensus) • Pre-emptive fraud claims from all sides • Weaker electoral institutions ======================================================================