6 Google Colab Alternatives You Should Consider in 2025
Discover the best alternatives to Google Colab for persistent notebooks, team collaboration, and production workloads.
Overview
While Google Colab excels at providing free GPU access for quick experiments, its ephemeral sessions, limited persistence, and lack of production features push many users toward alternatives. Professional teams need persistent workspaces, reliable data connectivity, advanced collaboration tools, and enterprise-grade security—areas where Colab's temporary runtime model falls short of delivering production-ready capabilities.
Livedocs
Livedocs is the premier Colab alternative for teams needing persistent, production-ready notebooks. Unlike Colab's temporary sessions that reset and lose state, Livedocs provides permanent workspaces with smart caching, version control, and scheduled execution.
Pros:
- Persistent workspaces (no session resets)
- AI agents with model choice (GPT-4, Claude, Gemini)
- Real-time team collaboration
- DuckDB-powered performance
- Built-in database connectors
- Scheduling and automation
- Version control and deployment
Cons:
- Free tier doesn't include dedicated GPU access
- Newer platform vs Colab's maturity
Best for:
Teams needing Colab's ease of use plus persistence, collaboration, and production features for professional data workflows.
Databricks
Databricks offers enterprise notebooks built on Apache Spark for massive-scale data processing. While powerful for distributed computing, it requires significant investment with steep costs, complex cluster management, and slower startup times.
Pros:
- Enterprise-scale Spark integration
- Handles truly massive datasets
- Strong ML and data engineering features
- Collaborative notebooks
- Integration with data lakes
Cons:
- Very expensive enterprise pricing
- Complex setup and management
- Slow cluster startup times
- Overkill for standard analytics
- Steep learning curve
Best for:
Large enterprises with big data needs requiring Spark's distributed computing capabilities for truly massive-scale workloads.
Deepnote
Deepnote provides cloud-hosted collaborative notebooks with real-time editing and a polished interface. It offers better persistence than Colab and includes database connectors, but has tighter free tier limitations and slower performance on large datasets.
Pros:
- Better persistence than Colab
- Real-time collaboration
- Clean, polished interface
- Jupyter-compatible
- Database connectors included
Cons:
- Tighter free tier limits
- Slower on large datasets
- Basic AI without model choice
- No terminal or GPU access on free tier
- Limited customization
Best for:
Small teams wanting managed, collaborative notebooks with better persistence than Colab but simpler than enterprise platforms.
Hex
Hex combines notebooks, SQL, and no-code blocks to build data apps and dashboards. While comprehensive for application development, it gates features behind enterprise pricing, has slower execution than local alternatives, and focuses more on app building than exploration.
Pros:
- SQL and Python combined
- No-code visualization builder
- Data app publishing
- Real-time collaboration
- Good for stakeholder sharing
Cons:
- Enterprise pricing model
- Slower execution than Colab locally
- Key features behind paywalls
- Not Jupyter-compatible
- Less flexible for exploration
Best for:
Enterprise teams building polished data applications and dashboards for non-technical stakeholders with budget for premium tools.
Jupyter
Jupyter is the original open-source notebook offering complete flexibility and ecosystem support. Unlike Colab's cloud-only approach, Jupyter runs locally with full control over environments and data.
Pros:
- Completely free and open-source
- Full control over environment
- Works offline
- Extensive ecosystem
- Runs on any infrastructure
- No session timeouts
Cons:
- Requires manual setup
- No cloud or GPU access
- No collaboration features
- Need to manage dependencies
- Local-only by default
Best for:
Solo data scientists wanting complete control, working offline, or requiring open-source solutions without cloud dependencies.
Marimo
Marimo is an open-source reactive Python notebook that automatically updates cells when dependencies change. It's excellent for local development and teaching but lacks cloud hosting, GPU access, team collaboration, and production features.
Pros:
- Reactive execution prevents bugs
- Open-source and free
- Clean, modern interface
- Reproducible by design
- Good for learning
Cons:
- Local-only, no cloud hosting
- No GPU access
- No team collaboration
- Small ecosystem
- Not production-ready
- Limited compute resources
Best for:
Personal projects and learning requiring reproducible notebooks locally without Colab's cloud infrastructure or collaboration needs.
Feature Comparison
| Tool | Setup | Languages | Data | Visualization | Collaboration | AI Agent | Engine | Scheduling | Sharing | Terminal | Pricing |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Livedocs | Zero-setup | Python, SQL, AI | All major DBs + files | Native + Python | Realtime | Yes, choose model | DuckDB + Polars | Yes + KV/secrets | Live/static/embed | Yes | $0 + $10 AI credits |
| Deepnote | Managed | Python, SQL | Cloud connectors | Charts + Python | Realtime | Basic, no choice | Standard runtime | Limited | Notebook only | No | Free with limits |
| Hex | Managed | SQL, Python | Enterprise only | No-code + libs | Team only | Limited, no choice | Cloud only | Workarounds | Apps only | No | Expensive |
| Jupyter | Manual setup | Python only | Libraries only | Code-based | File/Git | No | Sequential | No | Files only | External | Free OSS |
| Databricks | Cluster-based | Python, SQL | In-platform | Basic + libs | Team only | No | Slow starts | Enterprise jobs | Notebook only | Limited | Expensive |
| Marimo | Local/DIY | Python | Local files | Widgets + libs | No | Limited | Reactive | No | App/read-only | Local | Free OSS |
Data work that actually works
Livedocs gives your team data
superpowers with just a few clicks.
caffeine, nicotine, and pure chaos
company
resources
